A Fleischer Consulting LLP
DState contracts since 2010Updated Nov 13, 2026
A Fleischer Consulting LLP holds 3 contracts worth $21.6K with Office of the Attorney General; none active today. The first started in 2010.
- Total contract value
- $21.6K
- Current contract amounts
- Spent to date
- $14.8K
- 69% of contract value
- Active contracts
- 0
- None active today
- Contracts on record
- 3
- Since 2010
- Agencies served
- 1
- Most with Office of the Attorney General
- Years active
- 16
- First contract 2010
Contact & company
Business information and how to reach the company.
Contracts
3 contracts with New York State agencies, active first. Open a row for the full record.
| Details | Contract | Type | Contract no. | Term | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T103016 Hamilton/Kaye v. state T103016Contract not subject to state pre-audit | Office of the Attorney General | Contract not subject to state pre-auditNot pre-audited | T103016 | Aug 1, 2013to Dec 31, 2016 | Aug 1, 2013 | Dec 31, 2016 | $6,500$3,600 spent | $3,600 | |
Fadipe/Lawal v. State T102775Contract not subject to state pre-audit | Office of the Attorney General | Contract not subject to state pre-auditNot pre-audited | T102775 | Jan 1, 2013to Dec 31, 2016 | Jan 1, 2013 | Dec 31, 2016 | $7,100$6,400 spent | $6,400 | |
Mack/mesilien v state claim # 113918 T101599Contract not subject to state pre-audit | Office of the Attorney General | Contract not subject to state pre-auditNot pre-audited | T101599 | Mar 1, 2010to Dec 31, 2012 | Mar 1, 2010 | Dec 31, 2012 | $8,000$4,800 spent | $4,800 |
T103016 Hamilton/Kaye v. stateOffice of the Attorney GeneralAug 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2016$6,500
- Description
- T103016 Hamilton/Kaye v. state
- Contract number
- T103016
- Type
- Contract not subject to state pre-auditNot pre-audited
- Term
- Aug 1, 2013 → Dec 31, 20163.4 years
- Approved
- Nov 4, 2015
- Status
- Ended
- Amount
- $6,500
- Spent to date
- $3,600 · 55% of the amount
Fadipe/Lawal v. StateOffice of the Attorney GeneralJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2016$7,100
- Description
- Fadipe/Lawal v. State
- Contract number
- T102775
- Type
- Contract not subject to state pre-auditNot pre-audited
- Term
- Jan 1, 2013 → Dec 31, 20164 years
- Approved
- Aug 8, 2013
- Status
- Ended
- Amount
- $7,100
- Spent to date
- $6,400 · 90% of the amount
Mack/mesilien v state claim # 113918Office of the Attorney GeneralMar 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012$8,000
- Description
- Mack/mesilien v state claim # 113918
- Contract number
- T101599
- Type
- Contract not subject to state pre-auditNot pre-audited
- Term
- Mar 1, 2010 → Dec 31, 20122.8 years
- Approved
- Aug 2, 2011
- Status
- Ended
- Amount
- $8,000
- Spent to date
- $4,800 · 60% of the amount
Contract-type mix
Share of contract value by type
- Contract not subject to state pre-audit3 contracts$21.6K
Contracts over time
Contracts started per year
View as table
| Year | Contracts |
|---|---|
| 2010: 1 contracts, $8.0K | 1 |
| 2011: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2012: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2013: 2 contracts, $13.6K | 2 |
| 2014: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2015: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2016: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2017: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2018: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2019: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2020: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2021: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2022: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2023: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2024: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2025: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
| 2026: 0 contracts, $0.0 | 0 |
How the Contractor Score adds up
Limited (D, 36/100): small contract value ($22K).
- Contract volume−9.5measured
$22K in current contract value across 3 contracts, more than 14% of scored contractors.
- Recent activity−4.0measured
No active contracts today; the most recent was approved in November 2015.
- Agency breadth0.0measured
Contracts with one state agency or facility.
- Experience+1.5measured
First contract started in March 2010 (16 years of contract history).
- Contract-type mix−2.0measured
1 contract type; the largest group is contracts exempt from state pre-audit (100% of value).
- Spending vs. value−0.4estimated
On 3 completed contracts with spending recorded, spending is 69% of the contract value. Spending below the full value is common (work can finish under budget) and isn't treated as a problem.
- Federal award history0.0unknown
No federal award history found. Scored as neutral.
- Federal registration0.0unknown
No federal contractor registration found. Scored as neutral.
50 + contributions = 36 (D, Limited)Starts at 50. Bars: cool adds, warm subtracts.
Agencies served
Contract value with each agency or facility
Similar contractors
Since 20141 agency
- Contract value
- $21.7K
- Contracts
- 3
- Active
- 0
Since 20231 agency
- Contract value
- $21.4K
- Contracts
- 2
- Active
- 1
Since 20101 agency
- Contract value
- $21.3K
- Contracts
- 2
- Active
- 0
Since 20131 agency
- Contract value
- $22.4K
- Contracts
- 2
- Active
- 0
Since 20241 agency
- Contract value
- $22.4K
- Contracts
- 2
- Active
- 0
- D
Eisner Advisory Group LLC
New York, NY
Since 20231 agency
- Contract value
- $22.5K
- Contracts
- 1
- Active
- 0
- All contractors Search every New York State contractor
Browse more
Contract figures are public New York State contract records as of Nov 13, 2026: current contract amounts and spending to date as reported. Company details are shown when we can match this contractor to a registered business with confidence.
RFP Detector is an independent service and is not affiliated with any government agency. Scores are informational.